The New York Times one of the most reliable newspapers and the namesake for New York City's Time's Sqaure covered Accountability and admitting when you're wrong in their morning newsletter. This is the take from top experts:
Jennifer
Nuzzo is a health expert who has become nationally prominent during the
pandemic. She is the leading epidemiologist for Johns Hopkins
University’s much-cited data collection on Covid-19 testing. She is
active on Twitter and quoted frequently in the media. She can explain
complex ideas in clear terms, and she has often been prophetic about
Covid. |
Nonetheless,
she took to Twitter last May to criticize herself. She had expected
Texas’ ending of its mask mandate to lead to a surge in cases, and it
had not: |
Nuzzo’s small exercise in self accountability highlighted the inherent unpredictability of this virus. (Masks do reduce its spread, but the effect can be too modest to be visible
across an entire community or state.) Her tweet made a larger point,
too: People with a public platform should be willing to admit when
they’re wrong. |
There is no shame in being wrong at times.
Everybody is, including knowledgeable experts. The world is a messy,
uncertain place. The only way to be right all the time is to be silent
or say nothing interesting. |
The problem isn’t that people make mistakes; it’s that so few are willing to admit it. |
Many experts instead post aggrandizing praise of themselves on social media. They claim that each new development — be it on Covid, the economy, politics or foreign affairs
— justifies what they’ve been saying all along. They don’t grapple with
the weak points in their arguments and hope nobody notices their past incorrect predictions. |
We
journalists commit the same sins. More than a decade ago, in an effort
to do better, David Weigel of Slate (and now of The Washington Post)
introduced a concept he called “pundit accountability.”
It describes articles in which journalists highlight their own mistakes
— and not small factual errors, which often get corrected, but errors
of analysis, which don’t. |
Today’s
newsletter is my annual attempt at pundit accountability. Below, I’ll
link to other writers who have written similar articles in recent weeks. |
Looking
back on the past year of Morning newsletters made me feel proud of our
coverage, especially on Covid, and I’m grateful to the many readers who
have come to rely on the newsletter. But that’s enough
self-aggrandizement. As Nuzzo would say, accountability time. |
I, too, underestimated the unpredictability of the virus. |
Before the Delta variant emerged, infections among vaccinated people — known as breakthrough infections — were rare. I assumed that the pattern would probably continue throughout 2021. If it had, huge new waves of infection, like the current one, would have been impossible. |
Instead,
Delta led to an increase in breakthrough infections, and Omicron has
led to a larger increase. Symptoms are usually mild, but they can lead
to bad outcomes for a small share of vaccinated people whose health is
already vulnerable, like the elderly. The surge of breakthrough
infections means Covid often still dominates everyday life. |
I have since tried to absorb the lesson of Covid’s uncertainty and have emphasized it
in more recent newsletters. As Michael Osterholm of the University of
Minnesota — who has long emphasized Covid’s unavoidable unknowns — has
said, “We still are really in the cave ages in terms of understanding
how viruses emerge, how they spread, how they start and stop, why they
do what they do.” |
I was too skeptical of the early signs of waning vaccine immunity and the importance of boosters. |
Toward
the end of the summer, some researchers began pointing to data
suggesting that the power of vaccines waned after about six months.
Other researchers doubted that case,
saying that the data was unclear — and that pharmaceutical companies
had an obvious incentive to promote waning immunity and boosters. But
the case for boosters now seems clear. |
Another lesson: The quality of Covid data in the U.S. is poor, often clouding early judgments. It can make sense to look to Israel, where the data is better. Experts there quickly recognized that waning immunity was real. Other accountability“I
think it’s really important for the media and for other institutions
like the C.D.C. to build trust by being honest about when they got
things wrong,” Derek Thompson of The Atlantic said on The Bill Simmons Podcast. Thompson’s own mea culpa: underestimating breakthrough infections. |
|
